Atividade 7 anos de inglês prof: Givanildo 3ª semana de outubro.
Mande para o zap 981935494 ou e-mail da turma
Os pronomes
Fonte: https://www.todamateria.com.br/pronomes-pessoais-em-ingles/
Os pronomes pessoais em inglês (personal pronouns) são usados para indicar pessoas, lugares e
objetos nas frases.
Além dessa classificação, os pronomes em inglês
também podem ser:
• possessivos (possessive pronouns)
• demonstrativos (demonstrative pronouns)
• reflexivos (reflexive pronouns)
• indefinidos (indefinite pronouns)
• relativos (relative pronouns)
• interrogativos (interrogative pronouns)
Classificação dos personal pronouns
Os pronomes pessoais em inglês são classificados
em:
Subject Pronouns: equivalentes aos pronomes pessoais do caso reto em português, eles funcionam como sujeitos que praticam a ação verbal. Normalmente, surgem no início da frase antes de verbos ou preposições. Em relação ao grau, eles são utilizados no singular (I, you, he she, it) e no plural
Subject Pronoun |
Tradução |
I |
eu |
You |
você, tu |
He |
ele |
She |
ela |
It (neutro) |
ele, ela |
(we, you, they).
Possuem três gêneros: masculino, feminino e neutro.
O gênero neutro referese a lugares, animais, objetos, sentimentos, ideias, etc.
Observe abaixo a tabela de pronomes que funcionam
como sujeitos.
português, eles funcionam como objetos da frase, ou seja, quem ou o que recebe a ação.
São empregados após verbos e preposições e fazem
parte do predicado da frase. Eles são utilizados no singular (me, you, him,
her, it) e no plural (us, you, them).
A forma neutra “it” faz referência a animais,
objetos, lugares, ideias e sentimentos.
Object Pronoun |
Tradução |
Me |
me, mim, comigo |
You |
te, ti, lhe, você, contigo |
Him |
ele, lhe, o, lo, no |
Her |
ela, lhe, a, la, na |
It |
ele, ela, o, a, lhe, lo, la, no, na |
Us |
nós, nos, conosco |
You |
vocês, convosco, lhes, los, nos, os, as |
Them |
eles, elas, os, as, los, las, nos, nas, lhes |
Confira abaixo algumas frases com pronomes pessoais
em inglês:
Subject Pronouns
•
I prefer vegetables to meat. (Eu prefiro legumes do que
carne.)
•
You are doing really well at your job. (Você está indo
muito bem em seu trabalho.)
•
He lives in Chicago since 2013. (Ele mora em Chicago
desde 2013.)
•
She comes now. (Ela vem agora.)
•
It is the best city of the world. (É a melhor cidade do
mundo.)
•
We studied in England last summer. (Nós estudamos na
Inglaterra no verão passado.)
•
You are my best friends. (Vocês são meus
melhores amigos.)
•
They don’t speak Portuguese. (Eles não
falam português.)
Object Pronouns
•
Leave
me alone, I need to think about
this. (Me deixe em paz/sozinho, eu preciso pensar sobre isso.)
•
I
gave you a new car. (Eu lhe dei um
novo carro.)
•
I
told him about my husband. (Eu falei
para ele sobre meu marido/Contei-lhe sobre meu marido.)
• We love her (Nós amamos ela/Nós a amamos.)
Exercises (Exercícios)
1. (Unesp)
Leia o texto a seguir para responder a questão:
Analyze
an advertisement
Peter Sells
Sierra Gonzales
Not all advertisements make perfect sense. Not all
of them promote or imply acceptance of social values that everyone would agree
are what we should hope for, in an enlightened and civilized society. Some
advertisements appear to degrade our images of ourselves, our language, and
appear to move the emphasis of interaction in our society to (even more)
consumerism. There may even be a dark, seamy, or seedy side to advertising.
This is hardly surprising, as our society is indeed a consumer society, and it
is highly capitalistic in the simplest sense. There is no doubt that
advertising promotes a consumer culture, and helps create and perpetuate the
ideology that creates the apparent need for the products it markets.
(www.standford.edu. Adaptado)
O pronome it,
utilizado na última linha do primeiro parágrafo, na frase for the products it markets, refere-se
a) à
necessidade da propaganda.
b) à
área de publicidade.
c) à
ideologia da propaganda.
d) aos
mercados consumidores.
e) à
cultura do consumismo
Ver Resposta
2. (Fatec) Leia o texto a seguir para responder a
questão:
Fight
the Violence!
Oct 14, 2011 6:53 PM EDT
What if gang
violence in America could be reduced just by talking? Professor and activist
David Kennedy talks with Ben Crair about his new book, Don’t Shoot, criticism
of his plan, and the economics of gangs. In 1995, David M. Kennedy went to
Boston on behalf of1 Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government to study violent
crime. Like many American cities at that time, Boston was suffering a wave of
homicides. After linking up with a special Boston Police Department task force,
Kennedy and his team recognized that most of the killing was the work of a
small handful of identifiable gang members. Rather than locking them all up,
they tried something new: They met with the gang members and community leaders,
offered them assistance in getting off the streets, and warned them that, if
any single gang member committed another murder2, they would crack down3 on the
entire group. Crime dropped almost overnight, and Kermedy’s “Operation
Ceasefire,” as it has come to be known, has been implemented in more than 70
cities, addressing issues from gun violence to drug markets to juvenile
robberies. Now, Kennedy recounts his experiences in a new book, Don‘t Shoot:
One Man, a Street Fellowship, and the End of Violence in Inner-City America.
(Newsweek. 14.10.2011. Adaptado)
# on behalf of: em nome de
# murder:
assassinato
# crack down: usar de repressão com punição severa
2) O pronome objeto them empregado em – offered them assistance in getting off the streets – refere-se a
a) the
streets.
b) American
cities.
c) Kennedy
and his team.
d) Boston
Police Department.
e) gang
members and community leaders.
3. (UNIOESTE PR/2015)
Seven portions of fruit and vegetables are better
for you
For many years, the nutrition message has been “five
a day” – the recommendation that five portions of fruit and vegetables are
enough to keep disease at bay and help us to live longer. That advice has been
revised upwards. A new study suggests that people who get seven or more
portions a day are healthier. Researchers from University College London
studied the dietary habits of 65,000 adults over a seven-year period. They
concluded that:
“A robust inverse association exists between fruit
and vegetable consumption and mortality, with benefits seen in up to 7-plus
portions daily.” In other words, if you eat more fruit and vegetables, chances
are you live longer.
The researchers put people into five different
groups, depending on how much fruit and veg they ate. They found that those who
ate seven or more portions a day had a 42 percent lower risk of death than
those who ate just one portion. They recommended that schools serve healthier
meals and that supermarkets put more emphasis on prominently displaying cheaper
produce. They warned that frozen and canned fruit was linked to higher
mortality rates. Some experts say the findings of the study should be taken
with a pinch of salt. One dietician said the findings ignored the fact that
people who eat more fruit and veg are generally wealthier and thus lead
lifestyles that will help them live longer anyway.
Adapted from:
http://www.breakingnewsenglish.com/1404/140403-fruit-and-vegetables.html
Na frase “They found that those who ate seven or more portions a day…”, o pronome “they” refere-se a:
a) frutas.
b) vegetais.
c) pessoas.
d) diferentes
grupos.
e)pesquisadores.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário